Performance Improvement Consulting

Performance problems rarely have the cause you think they do.

Most performance problems get solved with training that doesn't work. I diagnose the real cause first, then build the right intervention. Every engagement ties to a measurable business outcome agreed up front.

You've already invested. The numbers haven't moved.

You've paid for training and the performance issue is still there. The same problems show up in reviews quarter after quarter. Your team is doing the work, attending the sessions, passing the assessments, and the business outcome you actually care about, error rates, compliance, satisfaction, productivity, throughput, still isn't where it needs to be.

You suspect the problem might not be a skills problem. But you don't have the time or the methodology to prove it, and every vendor who walks through the door is selling you the same answer: more training.

That's the gap I close.

Diagnose first. Then build the right thing.

i.

Diagnose

I find out what's actually causing the performance gap. Often it isn't what leadership assumed. Sometimes it's process. Sometimes it's incentives. Sometimes it's tools or environment. Occasionally it really is a skills problem, and when it is, you'll know with certainty.

ii.

Build

Once the cause is clear, I design the intervention that fits it. That might be training, a workflow redesign, a metric or incentive change, a tooling improvement, or an AI-powered process change. The intervention follows the diagnosis, never the reverse.

iii.

Measure

Every engagement begins by defining the specific business metric that has to move and the target. We measure against it. You'll know whether the work paid for itself, because we agreed on what success looks like before we started.

Two ways to start. One way to know it worked.

Entry engagement

Performance Diagnostic

For organizations that need to know the actual cause of a performance problem before committing to a solution.

A focused, fixed-fee engagement that takes two to four weeks. I work with your data, your people, and your processes to identify the root cause of the performance gap, then deliver a written diagnosis and recommended intervention plan.

You decide what to do next. No obligation to continue.

Best when: a performance issue is costing real money, leadership disagrees about the cause, or a proposed training investment feels like it might not be the right answer.
Full engagement

Performance Improvement Engagement

For organizations ready to fix the problem and measure the result.

A full-cycle engagement that begins with diagnosis and continues through intervention design, implementation, and outcome measurement against the success metric defined up front.

Scope varies with the problem, typically three to nine months.

Best when: the cause is already well understood, or as a continuation from a Performance Diagnostic.

Three problems. None of them were training problems.

Healthcare · 600 nurses

A hospital was about to retrain everyone on the EHR. The errors weren't about training.

Documentation errors had spiked after a new EHR implementation. Nursing leadership had proposed a full refresher training cycle for all inpatient staff.

Diagnosis showed the errors clustered around two specific patterns: shift change windows when nurses were documenting under time pressure, and a medication reconciliation screen that required navigating three tabs to enter a value nurses needed dozens of times per shift. The errors weren't random user errors. They were predictable consequences of workflow and screen design.

The fix was a screen modification submitted to the EHR vendor, an adjusted shift handoff protocol that gave nurses a brief documentation-catchup window, and a one-page job aid. No refresher training was delivered.

Result

Targeted documentation errors dropped roughly 70 percent within two months. The screen modification was adopted by the EHR vendor in a later platform release, with the hospital credited. The proposed training cycle was cancelled, avoiding significant backfill cost.

Manufacturing · 400 employees

A plant kept failing safety audits. The operators knew the procedure cold.

Internal safety audits at a food manufacturing plant flagged repeated lockout/tagout violations during minor equipment interventions. Two near-miss incidents in six months. Corporate EHS proposed mandatory refresher training for all production staff and supervisors.

A walkthrough with line supervisors and operators showed lockout stations were centralized in two locations, while many routine interventions happened on lines five to ten minutes away. Supervisors under output pressure were tacitly approving skipping lockout for quick tasks. Operators could recite the procedure verbatim. They simply weren't using it for short interventions.

The fix was six satellite lockout stations near high-frequency intervention points, revised supervisor accountability with weekly observation rounds, and shift output targets adjusted for proper lockout time. A short toolbox talk explained the changes. No formal training.

Result

Observed compliance moved from roughly 60 percent to above 95 percent over four months. Zero recordable lockout-related incidents the following year. The plant's approach was later adopted as the model for two sister facilities.

Insurance · 800 service reps

A call center was about to spend six figures on empathy training. The reps already had it.

Member satisfaction scores had been declining at a mid-sized health insurance company for three quarters. Leadership had received enough escalated complaints about rude or rushed reps that the VP of Operations had budgeted around $180,000 for an empathy and active listening curriculum.

Diagnosis revealed reps were evaluated on a scorecard where average handle time carried the most weight. Quality monitoring existed but accounted for a smaller share of the composite score. Team leads pulled handle time reports daily and coached anyone trending above target. Listening to calls confirmed reps knew how to be warm. They were rationally choosing not to be, because taking ninety seconds to acknowledge a frustrated member would hurt their numbers more than a complaint would.

The fix was rebalancing the scorecard so customer satisfaction and quality together outweighed handle time, changing the daily report team leads pulled, and a short coaching brief for managers. No rep training.

Result

Member satisfaction scores recovered to pre-decline levels within two quarters. Handle time rose modestly, offset by a measurable drop in repeat-contact rate. Net cost-per-resolved-contact improved.

Twenty years of asking the question most consultants skip: what's actually causing this?

Frederick Consulting is led by a senior instructional designer and performance improvement specialist with two decades of work across healthcare, manufacturing, financial services, and customer operations.

The methodology is rooted in the performance improvement discipline: training is one possible intervention among many, and rarely the right one until the actual cause is known. Work is fully remote, available to organizations from small businesses to enterprise clients, across any industry.

AI is used throughout the work to move faster and produce better diagnoses. AI is not the product. Outcomes are.

Principle i.

Diagnosis before prescription

No solution is recommended until the cause is understood. This inverts how most L&D and consulting vendors approach the conversation.

Principle ii.

ROI built in, not promised

Every engagement begins with the metric and target. We measure against it. You know whether it worked because we agreed up front on what working means.

Principle iii.

AI as accelerant, not product

AI makes the diagnostic and design work faster and better. It's a tool. The work being sold is the outcome.

Ready to find out what's actually causing the problem?

Bring the performance issue that's been frustrating you. By the end of a 30-minute conversation, you'll have at least a working hypothesis about the actual cause, and a sense of whether a deeper diagnostic engagement makes sense.

No pressure. No pitch. Just a useful conversation.

I respond within one business day.

Thank you.

Your message is on its way. You'll hear back within one business day with a few times for a 30-minute call.